Chassis design, material selection (aluminum, acrylic, carbon fiber, 3D printed), load distribution, structural analysis, and weight balancing

Chassis and Materials

The chassis is the structural backbone of a robot. Proper design ensures rigidity, lightweight operation, and reliable performance under load.

Chassis Types

Flat Plate Design

Simplest structure:

Components:
├─ Single or double aluminum plate
├─ Components bolt directly to plate
├─ Electronics mounted on top
└─ Motors/wheels attached to bottom

Advantages:
✓ Very simple to build
✓ Easy to modify
✓ Low cost
✓ Good for prototyping

Disadvantages:
✗ Less rigid (can flex)
✗ Limited sensor mounting points
✗ Looks industrial/unfinished
✗ Difficult wiring organization

Best for: Simple prototypes, line-following robots, basic platforms

Frame Design (Structural Skeleton)

Skeleton structure with mounting points:

Layout:
└─ Frame corners
   ├─ Aluminum channels or box tubing
   ├─ Internal cross-bracing
   ├─ Gussets at joints
   └─ Mounting rails throughout

Advantages:
✓ Very rigid (minimal flex)
✓ Many mounting options
✓ Professional appearance
✓ Organized wiring paths

Disadvantages:
✗ More complex to design
✗ Requires precision drilling
✗ Heavier than flat plate
✗ Takes longer to build

Best for: Competition robots, manipulators, systems with multiple sensors

Modular Design (Plug-and-Play)

Standardized mounting system:

System: 15mm or 20mm aluminum extrusion
├─ Interlocking T-slot channels
├─ Standard connector plates
├─ Quick assembly/disassembly
└─ Infinite reconfiguration

Examples: ITEM, 80/20, Makerbeam systems

Advantages:
✓ Extremely fast to build
✓ Modify design instantly
✓ Professional appearance
✓ Many off-the-shelf parts

Disadvantages:
✗ Expensive ($2-5 per cm)
✗ Custom parts not possible
✗ Heavier than custom
✗ Overkill for simple robots

Best for: Research, rapid prototyping, educational platforms

Integrated Design (Custom Enclosure)

Chassis as complete unit:

Approaches:
1. Molded plastic shell (injection molding)
2. CNC aluminum milling
3. 3D printed body
4. Carbon fiber composite

Integration:
├─ Electronics encased
├─ IP protection (water/dust)
├─ Aerodynamic design
└─ Single component

Advantages:
✓ Minimal part count
✓ Protected internals
✓ Professional product
✓ Optimized weight

Disadvantages:
✗ Expensive to prototype
✗ Difficult to modify
✗ Specialized manufacturing
✗ Long lead times

Best for: Final products, commercial robots, finished designs

Material Selection

Aluminum (Most Common)

Properties:

Alloy: 6061-T6 (standard structural aluminum)
Density: 2.7 g/cm³
Strength: Moderate (good rigidity/weight ratio)
Cost: Low ($1-5 per part)
Workability: Excellent (easy to cut, drill, tap)
Corrosion: Anodized finish prevents rust

Advantages:

✓ Lightweight (2.7 vs 7.8 for steel)
✓ Doesn't rust (with anodizing)
✓ Easy to machine and modify
✓ Excellent heat dissipation
✓ Recyclable
✓ Standard in robotics

Disadvantages:

✗ Lower strength than steel (same weight needs larger profile)
✗ Slightly more expensive than steel
✗ Can dent/bend
✗ CTE mismatch with electronics

Best for: Main chassis, mounting rails, motor mounts

Example Application:

Competition robot:
├─ 1/8" thick aluminum plate base
├─ 1" x 1" aluminum angle braces
├─ 1/4" thick aluminum sheet for panels
└─ Total weight: ~2 kg with all mounts

Acrylic (Transparent Plastic)

Properties:

Type: Thermoplastic (cast or extruded)
Density: 1.2 g/cm³
Strength: Moderate (brittle, can shatter)
Cost: Very low ($0.50 per part)
Workability: Good (cut, drill, bond)
Transparency: Crystal clear (excellent for viewing)

Advantages:

✓ Very lightweight
✓ Extremely cheap
✓ Can see through (sensor debugging)
✓ Easy to cut with water jet
✓ Quick prototyping
✓ Easy mounting (drilling doesn't damage)

Disadvantages:

✗ Brittle (shatters on impact)
✗ Scratches easily
✗ Lower rigidity (flexes more)
✗ UV sensitive (discolors over time)
✗ Can crack from stress concentration

Best for: Sensor shields, protective covers, camera mounts, prototypes

Example Application:

Mobile robot:
├─ Acrylic side panels
├─ Shows motor/wheel arrangement
├─ Lightweight protection
└─ Very quick to manufacture

Carbon Fiber (High-Performance)

Properties:

Type: Composite (carbon + epoxy resin)
Density: 1.6 g/cm³
Strength: Extremely high (steel strength at 1/4 weight)
Cost: High ($5-20 per part)
Workability: Moderate (must cut carefully, no drilling)
Rigidity: Exceptional

Advantages:

✓ Highest strength-to-weight ratio
✓ Extremely rigid (minimal flex)
✓ Professional appearance
✓ Excellent for high-speed robots
✓ Thermal stability

Disadvantages:

✗ Very expensive
✗ Difficult to modify (must plan ahead)
✗ Conductive (can cause electrical noise)
✗ Complex manufacturing
✗ Requires specialized tools to cut

Best for: Racing drones, high-speed competitors, weight-critical designs

Example Application:

Quadcopter frame:
├─ Carbon fiber tubing for arms
├─ 5x minimum rigidity vs aluminum
├─ 40% lighter than aluminum equivalent
└─ Survives crashes better

Steel (Maximum Strength)

Properties:

Alloy: Mild steel (1018 or 1045)
Density: 7.8 g/cm³
Strength: Very high (2.5x aluminum same profile)
Cost: Low ($1-3 per part)
Workability: Good (requires more force to cut/drill)
Corrosion: Rust without coating

Advantages:

✓ Maximum strength (can use thinner profiles)
✓ Cheapest per pound
✓ Excellent weldability
✓ Can be heat-treated for extra strength
✓ Works well in harsh environments

Disadvantages:

✗ Heavy (3x density of aluminum)
✗ Rusts quickly (must paint/powder coat)
✗ Harder to modify
✗ Conducts heat (can interfere with electronics)

Best for: Heavy manipulators, ground vehicles, harsh environments

Example Application:

Heavy robotic arm:
├─ Steel tubing for joints
├─ Supports 50+ kg payload
├─ Powder coated for rust protection
└─ Welded for permanent joints

3D Printed Plastic (ABS/PLA)

Properties:

Materials: ABS (strong, toxic fumes) or PLA (biodegradable)
Density: 1.0-1.2 g/cm³
Strength: Moderate (depends on infill %)
Cost: Very low ($0.10-0.50 per part after initial setup)
Workability: Excellent (re-design and reprint instantly)
Manufacturing: Hours to days per part

Advantages:

✓ Ultra-fast prototyping (design to part in hours)
✓ Complex geometry possible
✓ Very cheap at scale
✓ Easy to modify designs
✓ Minimal waste
✓ Custom shapes/pockets/bosses

Disadvantages:

✗ Lower strength than machined materials
✗ Requires post-processing (cleaning, reinforcement)
✗ Quality varies (layer delamination possible)
✗ Temperature sensitive (warping in sun)
✗ Layer lines reduce strength

Best for: Custom brackets, sensor mounts, prototype chassis

Example Application:

Mobile robot custom mount:
├─ Design in CAD
├─ Print overnight (8-12 hours)
├─ Test fit
├─ Iterate design (repeat above)
└─ Minimal cost per iteration

Material Comparison Table

Property	Aluminum	Acrylic	Carbon Fiber	Steel	3D Plastic
Density (g/cm³)	2.7	1.2	1.6	7.8	1.0-1.2
Strength	Moderate	Low	Extreme	Very High	Moderate
Rigidity	Good	Fair	Excellent	Excellent	Fair
Cost ($/piece)	$1-5	$0.50	$5-20	$1-3	$0.10-0.50
Workability	Excellent	Good	Moderate	Good	Excellent
Corrosion Resistance	Excellent (anodized)	Excellent	Excellent	Poor (rust)	Good
Durability	Excellent	Poor (brittle)	Excellent	Excellent	Fair
Thermal	Good conductor	Insulator	Good	Good conductor	Insulator
Best Use	General chassis	Prototypes	High-perf	Heavy duty	Custom parts

Load Distribution Analysis

Center of Mass (COM)

Keep COM low and centered:

Unbalanced (BAD):
Heavy battery mounted high
└─ Tips over easily, unstable

Balanced (GOOD):
Heavy components mounted low
└─ Stable, predictable handling

Distributed Load Calculation

Example: 20 kg mobile robot

Components (kg):
├─ Base plate: 2
├─ Motors (x4): 2
├─ Battery: 5
├─ Electronics: 1
├─ Gripper: 10
└─ Total: 20 kg

Load per corner (4-legged):
20 kg ÷ 4 = 5 kg per corner

Stress on mounting bolt (M5 aluminum):
Shear stress = Load ÷ Area
Area (M5) = 19.6 mm² = 0.000196 m²
Stress = 5 kg × 9.81 m/s² ÷ 0.000196 = 250 MPa
Safe? Yes (aluminum yield: 40 MPa) - but use larger bolt!

Better: Use M8 (50 mm²) = 100 MPa ✓

Stress Points

Locations that fail first:
├─ Motor mounting points (vibration + load)
├─ Wheel axles (repetitive stress)
├─ Battery strap points (sudden acceleration)
└─ Electronic component solder joints (thermal cycling)

Solutions:
✓ Over-size all fasteners by 1-2 sizes
✓ Use lock washers and thread locker
✓ Add gussets at high-stress corners
✓ Isolate vibration with dampers
✓ Regular inspection for cracks

Structural Design Principles

Triangulation (Most Rigid)

Structure:
    A
   /|\
  / | \
 B--+--C

Benefits:
✓ Diagonal braces prevent flexing
✓ Three-point suspension is rigid
✓ Four-point can flex (become parallelogram)

Gusset Placement

Reinforce at corners:

Without gusset:        With gusset:
    A                      A
   /|                      /|
  / |                     /||
 B  C      →             B |C
           └─ Gusset      \|
                           ↓
                        Rigid!

Box Tubing Rigidity

Profile comparison (same cross-section area):

Solid rod:    Hollow tube:    Box tubing:
    |            O              □
    |          O   O            ◻
   
Rigidity:     1x               8x              12x

Best for robotics: Box tubing (strong and lightweight)

Weight Balancing

Front-to-Back Balance

Mobile robot example:

Unbalanced (nose down):
Heavy battery in front → Tips forward downhill

Balanced:
Weight distributed → Stable on any slope

Calculation:
COM = (m₁ × x₁ + m₂ × x₂) / (m₁ + m₂)
Adjust component position until COM = wheelbase/2

Side-to-Side Balance

Left-to-right distribution:
Unbalanced → Drifts left/right in turns
Balanced → Straight-line tracking

Solution: Mirror component placement

Height Matters

Lower COM = More stable:

High COM: Unstable, tips easily ┌─┐
                                │ │
                                │C│← High COM
                                └─┘

Low COM: Stable, won't tip ┌────────┐
                           │        │
                           │   C    │← Low COM
                           └────────┘

Assembly Best Practices

Fastener Selection

Bolt head threads into nut:
├─ M3: Micro assemblies, PCB standoffs
├─ M4: Small components, electronics
├─ M5: General assembly, sensors
├─ M6: Medium loads, motor mounts
├─ M8: Heavy loads, wheel axles

Material:
✓ Steel (strong, cheap)
✓ Stainless (corrosion resistant)
✓ Aluminum (non-magnetic, lightweight)

Torque Values (Don't Overtighten!)

M4 bolt: 5-7 N⋅m
M5 bolt: 8-12 N⋅m
M6 bolt: 14-18 N⋅m
M8 bolt: 28-36 N⋅m

Rule: Tighten until snug, then stop

Thread Locking

Prevent vibration loosening:

Options:
├─ Lock washers (cheap, obvious)
├─ Nylon-insert lock nut (reliable)
├─ Thread locker fluid (permanent)
└─ Split pin (simple, visible)

Application: All outdoor/moving robots

Design Considerations

Critical Design Factors

Rigidity:

Chassis flex causes sensor misalignment
Wheels may not contact ground evenly
Motors may work harder (more power draw)
Solution: Over-dimension structural members

Access:

Design for easy motor/battery removal
Electronics should be replaceable
Don't sandwich everything tight
Solution: Modular panels

Thermal:

Electronics generate heat
Poor airflow → component failure
Solution: Add vents, space components

Vibration:

Motors create vibration
Loose fasteners fail quickly
Solution: Lock washers, thread locker, dampers

Real-World Examples

Example 1: Line-Following Robot

Requirements:
├─ Fast (must be lightweight)
├─ Precise (rigid frame)
└─ Simple assembly

Solution:
├─ Aluminum 2020 extrusion (very light)
├─ 3D printed motor mounts
├─ Triangulated braces
├─ Total weight: 300g
└─ Cost: $50

Material breakdown:
Aluminum frame: 30%
Plastic parts: 20%
Electronics: 50% by cost

Example 2: Robotic Manipulator Arm

Requirements:
├─ Heavy (10 kg payload)
├─ Rigid (precise positioning)
└─ Long reach (2+ meters)

Solution:
├─ Aluminum box tubing (1" x 1")
├─ Steel shoulder/elbow joints
├─ Carbon fiber for lightweight links
├─ Welded joints
├─ Total weight: 15 kg
└─ Cost: $500+

Forces: Must support 10 kg × gravity at 2m reach
Torque = 10 kg × 9.81 m/s² × 2 m = 196 N⋅m
Requires very strong motor and gearing

Example 3: Quadcopter Frame

Requirements:
├─ Minimal weight (must fly)
├─ Rigid (stability in wind)
└─ Impact resistant

Solution:
├─ Carbon fiber tubing (arms)
├─ 3D printed motor mounts
├─ Aluminum frame plate
├─ GPS antenna support
├─ Total weight: 1.2 kg (with battery)
└─ Cost: $300+

Crash durability: Can withstand 2m free fall

Troubleshooting

Problem	Cause	Solution
Chassis flexes	Weak material or undersized members	Use next size larger extrusion, add bracing
Wheels not level	Uneven assembly	Check flatness with level, adjust feet
Bolts keep loosening	Vibration	Use lock washers, apply thread locker
Rusting	Steel without coating	Powder coat or use stainless steel
Too heavy	Over-engineered	Switch to aluminum or carbon fiber
Cracks appearing	Stress concentration	Add fillets/gussets at corners
Misalignment	Thermal expansion	Use more fastening points, allow for adjustment

Summary

Chassis types:

Flat plate (simplest, weakest)
Frame (good balance)
Modular (fastest, expensive)
Integrated (professional, difficult)

Material selection:

Aluminum: Best general choice
Acrylic: Quick prototypes
Carbon fiber: Weight-critical
Steel: Heavy duty
3D plastic: Custom parts

Design principles:

Use triangulation for rigidity
Keep COM low and centered
Don't over-torque fasteners
Plan for vibration
Design for assembly access

Chassis and Materials

On this page